Gimp or Photoshop? A comparison
When comparing GIMP and Photoshop, one speaks of the struggle of professional image editing programs. We'll show you what they can do and whether GIMP has any chance against expensive Photoshop.
GIMP or Photoshop: Freeware vs. professional program
While the most popular photo editor, Photoshop, is expensive, GIMP is completely free. But what most people do not consider is that you first have to invest a lot of time with both of them to get to know and use the functions.
- While there is a professional team behind Photoshop that takes care of updates and problems, GIMP also helps normal users because it is an open source program. This allows you to react quickly to any bugs.
In comparison: surfaces from GIMP and Photoshop
- Photoshop is particularly convincing with a well-cleaned surface. The user has direct access to all functions and a perfect overview of the created levels.
- GIMP also offers a good overview with the two tool windows, but the floating windows are often criticized. As a result, the program does not appear so rounded. The usability of the floating windows is probably more a matter of taste.
Photoshop vs. GIMP: the tools
The usual standard tools such as brushes and various selection tools are available in both programs. The level views of both programs also benefit the professional user. However, Photoshop offers significantly more practical functions that make working much easier.
- Photoshop gives users a lot more tools and functions to create photo montages. For example, the free GIMP lacks the function of filling areas depending on the environment.
Data processing: RAW files are a Photoshop privilege
- A big advantage of Photoshop: It can process RAW files. These files contain all information of an image, so that afterwards all settings can be made in Photoshop.
- GIMP, on the other hand, gets in the way when importing RAW files: So it is not possible to edit a RAW file without additional programs.
Time factor: which program is faster?
- While GIMP comes with a slim 90 MB, Photoshop has to pay around 1 GB. This difference is particularly noticeable in the processing of large files: Photoshop has no trouble processing larger photos or files, while GIMP, on the other hand, weakens somewhat and takes more time.
- Another consideration is the time spent by the user. Many functions can be implemented faster in Photoshop than in GIMP. However, this largely depends on the user and the time invested.
Conclusion: GIMP is good and cheap
Even though Photoshop scores with its well-structured interface and user-friendliness, GIMP comes close to the expensive professional program. So you get many editing functions with GIMP and can install it on all operating systems. Professionals should invest in Photoshop - GIMP is enough for hobby projects.
If you have not yet used both programs and would like to try the free version first, we will show you the best 5 beginner tips for GIMP.